nibbling at the architecture; byrdsongs

This is basically an electronic notebook.Mostly urban detritus and journal motives, my thinkings and supporting pictures.Have a look make a comment.

Tuesday 24 March 2009

to watch in full later



Lot of good stuff comin outa these place.

Friday 20 March 2009

old money

I had seen photos of two or three of these rooms, but here be a beautiful walk through of the entire job.

moving units


Pichacao skills in an LA environment.Imagine this skill set and motivation practiced by every tagger in a city...result Sao Paulo.

Tuesday 17 March 2009

big bite out of wooster

One for all the artwranglers out there, probably further interesting stuff being said on their facebook too.

Sat >> Mar 14, 2009
Should Art Be Treated Like Stocks?

Over the last couple of weeks Sara and I have had lots of late night conversations with artists and gallerists from all over the world about the current state of the art market and where things might be headed.

One thing that's been surprising for us to hear is that quite a few galleries and artists are talking about cutting their prices for work from established artists.

Surprising because in the past it would be sacrilegious for a gallerist or artist who's built a base of collectors to even consider cutting prices on new work no matter how bad the environment was. For years we've heard gallerists say - "I'd rather go out of business then cut my artist's prices."

The reason for this has been that if you cut an artist's price you alienate the buyers who purchased similar sized work only months before. It's also seen a signal to collectors that the demand for the artist's work is waning.

But this year, with many galleries facing the real possibility of shutting their doors, the discussion of cutting prices has changed. Many gallerist and artists are admitting that the prices for a lot of the work over the past few years has been far too high, rose far too quickly, and now completely impossible to sustain. Seemingly overnight, many artists went from pricing their work at $3,000 to $30,000.

So what do these artists do now? That's what everyone is asking. Do they cut their prices so their galleries can try survive? Do they hold their prices and wait it out?

One European gallery told us that they were thinking of cutting prices by as much at 30% this year. They said:

"As an investment, art should be treated no different than a stock. Investments go up and down. Why shouldn't art? On the flip side - If you buy art not as an investment but because you love it, why should it matter to you if the price comes down? You bought it because you loved it, not because of it's value."

We'd love to hear more opinions of what people think. If you have some thoughts email us, send a note via Twitter to @MarcSchil, or post a message on to Wooster Collective Facebook page.
Posted by marc at 12:21 PM

Friday 13 March 2009

for me

Whats hot this season? Well still these guys for sure, and fair enough too.

Thursday 12 March 2009

in other news

smaller front no.8
While i'm painting might as well be posting, used to have a rule no weapons, nothing sexual. Seems i'm slipping.

Tuesday 10 March 2009

Call ME

Seems the Mighty Boosh is calling me out.

callme
Call me i can show you how gay my dance is too...